If you are reading this post , then you are probably on some kind of social network right now.
Our blog posts are usually found in this way because because we link them to Facebook, LinkedIn, Insta or BluesSky link. Some find us also via Google, because they a24> searching for coaching and good advice and “stumble upon” then also about our other content and the blog posts.
That with the “social networks” is such a thing. On the one hand, they can be a blessing: We find people who have interesting things to share with us, can share our own interesting things, come there and again into the exchange with good people to good projects, from which then perhaps also something together will come… We network with each other.
On the other hand, it’s wild: who or what we see is determined by the algorithm, not us. “Conversations” quickly escalate, the tone becomes rude or even offensive – sometimes all it takes is a wrong choice of words, a misplaced punctuation mark, a moment of inattention. And every day, a different “scandal” is chased through the village… and outrage is rewarded by the algorithm. And there is always something to be outraged about. And in the end, we can’t even be sure whether the source of the excitement was “real” or the work of AI.
The question remains: How sensible is it to engage in social networks? Is the benefit great enough to outweigh all the disadvantages and a16> the damage to our well-being be offset?
We are very interested in: What added value do Facebook, Insta, LinkedIn and others offer you? Have you had good experiences that have had a positive impact on a18> your development, your career, your business have had an effect on? Can virtual networks keep up a29> networks in the analogue world keep up? Or do we need both?
Please write your experiences in the comments section – and let’s find connected answers to the question “What kind of networks do we really need?”.
Warm regards from the andersberater:innen!
Thomas
